<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mousetrap Archives - Utah.Film</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.utah.film/tag/mousetrap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.utah.film/tag/mousetrap/</link>
	<description>movies made in, for and about Utah</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Mild Cheers for this Cheeky Meta-Murder-Mystery</title>
		<link>https://www.utah.film/reviews/mild-cheers-for-this-cheeky-meta-murder-mystery/</link>
					<comments>https://www.utah.film/reviews/mild-cheers-for-this-cheeky-meta-murder-mystery/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark LaRocco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FrontPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agatha Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mousetrap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[See How They Run]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.utah.film/?p=51161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the version of Agatha Christie’s “The Mousetrap” that my wife and I saw at Hale Centre Theatre inSandy, Utah last year, an inspector arrives at a country manor in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.utah.film/reviews/mild-cheers-for-this-cheeky-meta-murder-mystery/">Mild Cheers for this Cheeky Meta-Murder-Mystery</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.utah.film">Utah.Film</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the version of Agatha Christie’s “The Mousetrap” that my wife and I saw at Hale Centre Theatre in<br>Sandy, Utah last year, an inspector arrives at a country manor in a snowstorm, someone is offed, and<br>oddball houseguests are interrogated. Nearly every character is given believable motives for killing the<br>victim, and the audience all become surrogate inspectors, champing at the bit to figure out “whodunit.”<br>The final reveal is so shocking that the epilogue breaks the fourth wall, with actors swearing the<br>audience to secrecy. Don’t spoil the ending!</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Christie’s famous play has never been adapted for the big screen—more on that later—but director Tom<br>George is trying to sneak it past the ushers and the ticket takers. In theaters now, George’s British-<br>American comic mystery “See How They Run” swoops in on London’s West End circa 1953, where “The<br>Mousetrap” is being celebrated by its cast and crew for staging its 100 th consecutive performance, the<br>play having opened the prior year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Saoirse Ronan and Sam Rockwell play a pair of detectives on the hunt for a murderer who is terrorizing<br>cast members of “The Mousetrap.” The story follows the plucky duo as they find clues, pursue leads,<br>and interview suspects in the theater world. Meanwhile, a “Mousetrap” film adaption is being<br>considered by real-life movie producer John Woolf (of “The African Queen” fame), but would-be<br>Hollywood director Leo Kopernick (Adrien Brody) wants to jazz up the movie version with a fiery, bloody<br>ending that will be sure to put American butts in the seats. The brash, arrogant director drunkenly flirts<br>with the play’s female lead, Sheila Sim, whose husband Dickie Attenborough defends her honor in the<br>traditional way (fisticuffs).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Brody’s exaggerated features make him look like a caricature of a real person. In fact, as we learn (or are<br>reminded of by Brody), the first victim of a murder-mystery is usually a sleazy scoundrel. There will be<br>no shortage of suspects with reasons to kill Brody, who narrates the story even after his own death at<br>the beginning of the movie. I’ve heard of unreliable narrators, like Rachel Watson from “The Girl on the<br>Train,” but dead narrators? Yes, they exist, because movies make their own rules. It worked for sardonic<br>Lester Burnham in “American Beauty,” and for “Sunset Boulevard’s” Joe Gillis. That blew me away. Even<br>the exploits of the Desperate Housewives are made known to us by a deceased housewife.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Compositionally, this movie smacks of a Wes Anderson picture, with snap-zooms, hyper-frequent use of<br>symmetry, split screens which are often used during flashbacks, a few title cards (one of which is directly<br>referenced on-screen by foppish playwright Mervyn Cocker-Norris, played by David Oyelowo), and a<br>jaunty score consistent with the times.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>If I was forced to write a one-word review, it would be: Cheeky. This meta-murder mystery might make<br>for a smashing good time, if you are in the mood and in the know. This movie is overstuffed with so<br>many winks and nods it will make your head spin trying to keep up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Ronan plays the eager, young trainee Constable Stalker, doe-eyed and bursting with enthusiasm as she<br>is assigned to work with a world-weary lush, Inspector Stoppard (Rockwell). The two are assigned to<br>investigate Kopernick’s death, whose desired film version of the play would bear little resemblance to<br>the play, but is that a sufficient motive for murder? Much of the comedy is mined from Ronan, whose<br>love of cinema and the arts cannot be contained, and she helpfully explains to her partner (and by<br>extension, us) who the main players are and what other plays they were in and why they are important.<br>She also has the quirky but critical habit of writing everything down.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although fictional, much of the story within the story is true. Agatha Christie notoriously disliked film<br>adaptations of her work, and decreed that “The Mousetrap” could not be made into a movie until six<br>months after the end of its theatrical run. Fast-forward 70 years, and “The Mousetrap” (except for a<br>brief respite during the Covid-19 Pandemic), is the world’s longest running play. The production’s<br>apparent endlessness has left more than a few hopeful moviemakers in its wake. Will it ever be allowed<br>a proper film treatment? This is where the “meta” comes in. “See How They Run” is the closest possible<br>thing (for now) to a film adaptation of “The Mousetrap,” as all the characters in this movie know about<br>“The Mousetrap,” are starring in, writing, or producing it, trying to twist it into a Hollywood production<br>or are anxiously watching performances of it. The meta-nature is many-layered, as “The Mousetrap”<br>itself is allegedly based on a real murder, and this movie knows that, and then another real murder<br>occurs among the cast. As to whether Dame Agatha herself makes an appearance, it shan’t be spoilt by<br>me.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Now, for my opinion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Did I like it?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Sure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>But be warned: What may be to some people a fun, fast-paced, clever whodunit full of witty one-liners<br>may for others be an exhausting exercise in indulgence, perhaps too clever by half. I suppose that if you<br>are a fan of murder mysteries, especially British ones, and most especially those of Christie, you will<br>understand the references, asides, throwaway lines, and even the significance of the names of the<br>players. Consider the following: In one scene, Inspector Stoppard is called a real hound. Now, how many<br>people know that famous playwright Tom Stoppard wrote a one-act play called “The Real Inspector<br>Hound”? Not me, at least not until I read it online after seeing the movie. This is the type of movie that<br>likely has the 2019 smash hit “Knives Out” to thank for its greenlighting. But “Knives Out’s” popularity<br>was due primarily to its populism: It’s a charming, thrilling, funny well-written crowd-pleaser that<br>required almost no a priori knowledge to enjoy it wholeheartedly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>This is not to say that “See How They Run” cries out for a scholarly mastery of the genre, nor that one<br>must be well-versed in the works of Christie. But, I could definitely see how it would help. The movie is<br>forgettable but pleasing escapist fare for its 98 minutes on one level, but I suppose a deeper<br>appreciation requires the aforementioned depth of knowledge. I’m guessing the deep cuts will be a<br>bridge too far for most.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>I likely fall into the former category. I’m not an especially astute student of the genre it both spoofs and<br>adores, and I haven’t read more than one Christie book. Having said that, it mostly worked okay for me.<br>I’m certain that some of what I suspect was supposed to be uproariously funny elicited a chuckle. The<br>biggest laughs came from the detective duo’s banter, with Rockwell’s pauses, sideways glances, and<br>other reactions to Ronan’s earnest over-explanations of nearly everything.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>If you fancy classic whodunits, you will be happy to hear that, yes, there is a murder (or two?), an<br>investigation of various suspects, a surprise reveal and a delicious twist. Maybe you will be smart<br>enough to not only get the references but to discover the culprit before it is revealed on-screen. Or<br>maybe you will be like me, having a laugh without being fully immersed, always being reminded that<br>you’re watching a movie that not only knows it’s a movie, but knows it’s a murder mystery while it is also spoofing murder-mysteries, and, even knows that it would like to be faithful retelling of “The<br>Mousetrap,” but blimey, Dame Agatha has spoken, and it simply cannot be. But, this is the next best<br>thing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Although if you have a chance to see “The Mousetrap” live, do take it. I promise I won’t spoil the ending.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By Mark R. LaRocco, 9.23.2022</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.utah.film/reviews/mild-cheers-for-this-cheeky-meta-murder-mystery/">Mild Cheers for this Cheeky Meta-Murder-Mystery</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.utah.film">Utah.Film</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.utah.film/reviews/mild-cheers-for-this-cheeky-meta-murder-mystery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
